THE APOLLO CULT: A EUGENICS CULT
Apollo was also known
as the “Hyperborean” and invader from the north. Thus, he is
indicated as Nordic or Aryan. This is corroborated, for example, through
the symbol of his chariot, the early technological means of Aryan
dominance. Yet he is also known as “The most Greek.”
Thus, here we see the
Nordic type is posited as a racial ideal among the ancient Greeks. To be
clear, the Apollonian cult was consciously developed as a
eugenic cult in citifying conditions. Here we find an effort to maintain
and even ameliorate a primary founding type. The rituals of the Thargelia
makes this beyond dispute.
Apollo bore the
epithets Archegetes meaning “founder” and Genetor meaning “ancestor.” In
a manner he is more primordial than even Caelus or even his father Jupiter. He
certainly is more central. He is certainly more
perfect. To the Pythagoreans, who sought to “abstract” him, steal him, to
divide him, he was, esoterically, the monad (☉).
In the ancient
Religion, he is a God of intelligence, beauty, athletics, warfare, art and
poetry. He served as a model for a desired breed, the well-proportioned,
well-rounded, polymath. He was the original “Renaissance Man.” He was
understood as embodying all the Gods of the ancient world. To wit, the
other, more specialized types are best understood as deriving from this ideal,
more generalized type. Leaders of men, princes, too must
be generalized, understanding, and appealing to this man as well as the
next. They must be both artists and warriors, thinkers, and feelers,
above yet in touch. To be clear, that he is generalized does
not prevent him from being master of all trades.
Indeed, there is no
God among the Olympians who possesses a skill or ability that Apollo does not
as well. His gifts are inborn and the product of breeding. Of
this there can be little doubt. The myths relay that he was merely three
years old he slew Python! Apollo is the god of the Greeks and,
by extension, implicitly, the Romans however relatively less emphasized he was
among them until Augustus. Spengler classes the Greco-Roman civilization
as Apollonian. This we can accept.
Apollo is also the
Kouros[1] or rather a God of youth. But this is
to say: he not merely represents an image of individual youth but also of
racial youth. In other words, Apollo, the founder, and most ancient
racial type, at least within the civilizational context, was
also the most racially youthful, least aged or degenerated.
This “racial aging” is obvious in any cursory comparison of, say, Nordic and
Semitic types, where the former is fair, neotenous, fine-featured and the
latter, dark, large featured, drooping. Indeed, within the individual human
such a transformation takes place during a life. So, it is likewise with
a race when its health is neglected and racial death approaches.
The Greek Kouros.
We find corroboration
for this concept of racial agedness and maturity in the JEM. For example,
we find it in the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, written
by the Jewish Esotericist Charlie Kauffman. The sophistication of the
Jewish figure Joel Barish, played by the non-Jew Jim Carrey, is contrasted with
Aryan figures. Here, as throughout JEM, ethnicity is conveyed
through naming conventions.
These Aryans include
Joel’s sexual competitor Aryan Patrick Wertz (Elijah Wood), the vied for love
interest, Aryan Clementine Kruczynski (Kate Winslet) and the secondary
character of Mary Svevo (Kirsten Dunst). Clementine and Mary are
characterized as whimsical, impetuous, and immature. The young, naïve,
sexually insecure Patrick is even given the nickname “baby boy.” Here we
can be sure Kaufmann adheres to the “Parabolists Law of Microcosm.”
The Aryan Patrick Wertz (Elijah wood)
or “baby boy” in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
As mentioned, the
figure of Saturn, often conflated with Chronus or “Time”[2] —to wit “Old Father Time”— best conveys the
racial agedness of Jews. And as this study discusses, Saturn is one of
the gods most closely associated with Jews. Yet here it is important to
remember Apollo, the primogenitor, is the older God though not the more aged.
“Old Man Time”, a figure clearly
derived from the Jewish or proto-Jewish God of Saturn.
With the Thragelia
this study discusses examples of “negative eugenics” within the Apollo cult,
where efforts were made to eliminate negative traits from the gene pool, but
there is also evidence of positive eugenics. The Kouroi, the idols of the God
Apollo, the heroic depictions of the God or his heroic “avatars” in parable all
served as “positive eugenics.” These and the God himself were ideals
against which to measure men and encourage a “rejuvenating” eugenic mate
selection. The idols of the Aryan Kore (“maiden” or “girl”), the female
equivalent of the Kouros, serves the identical purpose for the female
sex. Their emphasis is rightly placed on sexually propriety.
Hence Apollo, “the
protector of flocks”, must be understood as the breeder and protector of both
Kouros and Kore. In the case of the latter, his role is to prevent her
abduction by Semitic and non-Aryan elements represented in the context of the
Eleusinian mysteries by the figure of the Semitic Pluto. The Semitic Mercury’s
theft of Apollo’s flock tells the same story of Pluto’s abduction. To be
sure, these myth and whatever cults that attended them were subversive Art and
Religion, JEM.
Regarding the Kore
and Kouros idols the artist was correctly perceived as a “Pygmalion”[3], to wit, a creator of types. He remains
this, through all times, for better or worse. We sometimes say art
imitates life, but this is also a way of saying we will not direct life in a
positive direction through art, we will not take responsibility. The correct
formulation is that life imitates art. Hence, we will make our art
Apollonian and likewise life.
This worship of
Apollo, occurring in the ancient world, and representing an effort to breed a
higher type, goes a long way in explaining a hatred of idol worship among Jews
and Christians. Indeed, as mentioned, we perceive this hatred of Aryan eugenics
in Jews to this day who move in every single instance to check its development.
For here the Jewish or Semitic type found himself disparaged, inadequate and
disadvantaged in a mating competition, especially for fair Aryan “Kore” or
“Venus.” He was in a sense the old, disregarded man among desirable
youth. He needed a plan. JEM is his plan.
In ancient Greek
society, during the month of Apellaios, the Kouros was
initiated into the Phratry or “Brotherhood/Fraternity” as he entered manhood.
Phratry may also mean “kinfolk” and was a subdivision of phyle or “tribe.” The
Phratry controlled access to civic society and membership within the Phratry
was a requirement for citizenship. These relatively ideal conditions persisted
until the reforms of Cleisthenes in 508 BC.
The Phratries
contained smaller kin groups known as Gene meaning “race, stock or kin.”
These subdivisions appear to have arisen later than Phratries and appear to
comprise of noble families. Not all Phratry members were involved in
Gene. Hence, we are encouraged to see even a conscious refinement toward
racial or eugenic thinking amid increasingly urbanized conditions.
Eventually Gene would
become associated with hereditary priestly function. Modern historians commonly
scratch their head at these opaque organizations called Phratry, yet, in a
sense, what is happening here couldn’t be clearer.
It is these Phratry,
related specifically to the cult of Apollo, and not Männerbund that
we are interested in restoring. The Männerbund, in contrast, is a
modern term coined by German ethnologist Heinrich Schurtz to describe East African
initiation rituals. It was later adopted by the German writer Hans
Bluher who placed an emphasis on homoeroticism as a cement in male
bonding.
Bluher even
recommended pederasty as a means of cohering men for a stronger nation and
state. This does appear to be part of the “glue” that holds Jews together as
this study discusses. However, as this study also discusses, appearances of
homosexuality and pederasty in the ancient world, whether among philosophers or
Gods, should be understood as they are understood today, as part of a decadence
and Semitization. The Aryan animal does not persist impurely.
Apollo we should
understand unequivocally as our God. In fact, he may be the
only God which we may say this without reservation. He is removed from
criticism in our circles on the grounds that as a symbol he is “nothing” but a
synonym for the purest, fairest, most ancient, most talented, and most eugenic
element of our race as even the JEM corroborates. He is
“nothing” but the most important thing. Christians and Norse or Celt
pagans cannot convincingly posit the same of their chief Gods. In fact,
as we will discover, their Chief gods are anti-Apollonian.
The less perfect
Jupiter is honoured because he overthrew the Jewish Saturn and created the
conditions by which Apollo might re-appear. The rest, Gods and Goddesses
alike, should be honoured, as models for men and women, as might corresponding
angels of Christianity vis-à-vis the Jewish God. To wit, they are
honoured only to the extent these other Gods protect, honour, serve and further
Apollo. Otherwise, they are among the overthrown monsters and Titans.
Lastly it must be
remarked, the cult of Apollo is not nationalism nor even remotely related to
it. Indeed, the cult of the northern hyperborean Apollo is not tied to
Anatolia or the Mediterranean where in antiquity Bacchus or Christ would win
the day, let alone to any nation as we now define them. If it is tied to
any modern land, it is Scandinavia, “the womb of nations.” Yet even this is
wholly irrelevant as before this he dwelt in Caucasia and who knows where.
The cult of Apollo is
tied only to race, our race, where its fairest, purest, strongest, most
beautiful, most intelligent and highest element is venerated. As any
Religion and any life form that desires survival, it seeks an unmitigated
expansion and dominance. That Europe will soon be defended by it
and will in the future be ruled by it, does not mark Europe as unique, whatever
nostalgia we inevitably feel toward this land.
Whether blonde
Nordic, brunet Gaul or dusky Mediterranean, everyman must decide simply, is it
better Apollo or Saturn rule? If he insists on his vanity, believing his type,
his “nation” the ideal, the perfect alchemy, he we will choose the latter by
default. A race does not “maintain”, any more than nature
“maintains.” It goes in this direction or that, to the underworld or the
heavens.
Apollo, a solar god,
is not earth bound or “nation bound,” even if the lands of the earth, and all
worlds he encounters, will owe their fertility and fair beauty to him.
Rather he, forever conjoined with an unsurpassable metaphor, rules 93 million
miles[4] above the earthly Semitic gods whom in their
profoundest delusion believe they have some sway over him. Rather they
revolve around him, and he ends their Dionysian winters on a whim.
Here we should be
careful to distinguish this eugenic cult from a piety cult, as appears in
Judaism and Christianity. In the latter, the mission to “do good”
disguises a cult that, dysgenically, places both the priest type and slave type
highest. In the Apollonian cult morality is tied directly to Aryan
eugenics and the survivability of the cult itself in these conditions or
that. Obviously, any suggestion or appearance of unnecessary cruelty or
lewdness, within a non-degenerate understanding of these things, is against the
interests of any cult.
[1] The Kouroi were the free-standing sculptures
that populated the sanctuaries of Apollo. Representing physical ideals, I
suggest they served a eugenic function. The term kouros means “youth,
boy, especially of noble rank.”
[2] Chronos or Chronus, the personification of
Time, is ostensibly a separate deity from Cronus or Saturn, yet the two deities
were frequently conflated in the ancient world, either due to a confusion
arising from similar names or consciously. The latter seems most likely
in the opinion of this author.
[3] Pygmalion was a mythic Cyprian sculptor
appearing in Greco-Roman myth. He created a sculpture of a woman so
beautiful he fell in love with it. Venus answered his prayers and turned
the sculpture flesh and blood.
[4] This is the estimated distance of the sun
from the earth.
Read more here: The Cult of Apollo Part II: The Apollonian versus the
Vulcanian and here: The Cult of Apollo Part III: Apolloism versus
Christianity and here: Why Apolloism is 3.0
Share this:
No comments:
Post a Comment
20,000+ PAGE VIEWS PLEASE COMMENT WITH FEEDBACK